Our testimony in Hablinski v. Amir led to a federal court upholding an award of $5.9 million in damages to the plaintiff, the largest for an architectural copyright case in the United States. The exterior was substantially similar, and even though the rooms had different names, the interior layout was over 95% identical.

In Phoenix (Humphreys v. Tibsherany) and Las Vegas (Tibsherany v. Built Form). In the former, we showed the defendant's floor plans and façades did not meet the substantial similarity test, while in the latter, they did.

In Davidson v. USA and USPS, the United States Postal Service wanted to show the Statue of Liberty copy at the New York Hotel and Casino as part of the architecture. Our testimony clearly showed no part of the sculpture or its immediate context could be considered architecture, and the plaintiff was awarded $3.5 million in damages.

In Oravec v. Sunny Isles, we showed substantial similarities in almost every aspect of the two building designs and that the defendant design firm had never designed a building like that of the plaintiff. But the appeals court ruled the original (the top one) was simply a concept.

Involving an existing factory outlet mall and a nearby proposed factory outlet mall, we showed that the footprints, spatial patterns, windows, and façade elements of the proposed mall were substantially similar to the existing one.